NaToED's comments
<< back to profile
Comments: 35 | Prop Total: 4 | Avg: 0.11
Photo | Video | News | Wall
  • + 1 props
(Aug 18, 2009 at 12:45) (Below Threshold) show comment
very nice . I'm running magura's too . found them to be a realy nice fork for th emoney
  • + 1 props
(Apr 11, 2009 at 14:37) (Below Threshold) show comment
is that the guy who knocked my door that night?
  • + 1 props
(Apr 2, 2009 at 14:35) (Below Threshold) show comment
it's so people can avoid it at all costs
  • + 0 props
(Apr 2, 2009 at 0:25) (Below Threshold) show comment
sweet classic man
  • + 0 props
(Mar 18, 2009 at 9:21) (Below Threshold) show comment
in it!!
  • + 0 props
(Mar 17, 2009 at 8:56) (Below Threshold) show comment
old school single i like
  • + 0 props
(Nov 21, 2008 at 12:03) (Below Threshold) show comment
just behind the seat tube . connected to the silver link plate . very short travel shock. i would lower the plate and make it longer.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 17, 2008 at 12:57) (Below Threshold) show comment
the shock is at the wrong angle .
  • + 0 props
(Nov 17, 2008 at 12:54) (Below Threshold) show comment
i got a paint program that does 2d rendering.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 16, 2008 at 3:53) (Below Threshold) show comment
most of the old urt designs had 3 bar design.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 16, 2008 at 3:52) (Below Threshold) show comment
hey done it . i've put a rendered version of my design on
  • + 0 props
(Nov 15, 2008 at 3:42) (Below Threshold) show comment
carbon fibre shock cover like on MX bikes? merkel your getting better . HOw ar eyou uploading these i can'r sem to be able too Frown
  • + 0 props
(Nov 15, 2008 at 3:37) (Below Threshold) show comment
wrong 3 bars do work . look at the old DB-X10 that worked
  • + 0 props
(Nov 13, 2008 at 14:15) (Below Threshold) show comment
NOW that IS better
  • + 0 props
(Nov 12, 2008 at 12:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
see . together we could design an awesome bike Smile
  • + 0 props
(Nov 12, 2008 at 1:24) (Below Threshold) show comment
it would pull AWAY from the shock
  • + 0 props
(Nov 12, 2008 at 1:24) (Below Threshold) show comment
and it would move as you have set the Main pivot point for the upper linkage is the same distant from the main pivot of the lower swing arm ; ergo the two plates will take parallel arc through the travel if the upper arm is shortened so the connection is at a right angle to the arms Vector.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 12, 2008 at 1:17) (Below Threshold) show comment
it won't move as it is now.........LOOK AT THAT LINK PLATE .......it will just flop up and down and not put any force on the shock. At least move the link plate so it is travelling parallel to the Arc of the swing arm so it pushes the upper linkage.

The main swing arm at the moment exerts zero force on the Linkage plates ; and never will as the little blue link will just rotate up and down around the pivot on the upper swing arm . The lower arm will just smash into the upper linkage.

If it ever were to move it would be trying to extend the upper linkage and not compress it. That would mean you need to attach a pull shock extending upwards just above the main pivot connecting to the upper link plates.

You can't just shove link plates willy nilly . get a bit of card and make a mock up . Then you'll see what I mean.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 14:19) (Below Threshold) show comment
nope just remove the silly little link plate between the two swing arms. That would give a direct link so it won't flop about. THEN it will work . as it is you'd need 2 shocks working in diffrent ways. I'm trying to upload a good frame i knocked up in 20mins.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 14:13) (Below Threshold) show comment
super light weight paper design.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 14:10) (Below Threshold) show comment
as it is the shock just floats round doing nothing until the frame bottoms out . the shock needs to be mounted to a non moving surface to work.
take the "A" part away and mount the "C" part to the frame to work
  • + 1 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 14:07) (Below Threshold) show comment
yes it would .
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 14:02) (Below Threshold) show comment
no the swing arm would hit the top link before the shock is moved
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11) (Below Threshold) show comment
to many linkage plates . Use a direct pivot point on the "C" shaped link to the "A" shock mount . Again as it is it would just be all floppy unloaded.
  • + 1 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 12:08) (Below Threshold) show comment
you need to ad a pull shock on the chain stay pivots to control the swing arm . It would link the two pivot points on the lower swing arm . as it is it would just flop up as soon as the bike is placed on the ground and then drop down when the bike lifts . That would cause extra stress around those points ; leading to fatigue and eventual failure . nice idea.
  • + 0 props
(Nov 11, 2008 at 12:04) (Below Threshold) show comment
wont work . Check then recheck some of those linkage angles
  • + 0 props
(Oct 30, 2008 at 11:04) (Below Threshold) show comment
top plate is wrong way round. invert it and place the pivot point lower and nearer to the seat tube.
  • + 0 props
(Oct 30, 2008 at 11:02) (Below Threshold) show comment
wouldn't work very well . pivot points would need refining. but ok
  • - 1 props
(Oct 18, 2008 at 13:16) (Below Threshold) show comment
nice but i want the apollo XC20 girls in the rackingSmile
  • + 0 props
(Oct 18, 2008 at 13:06) (Below Threshold) show comment
sort your bars out mate , they are angled all wrong. Sit on the saddle , place your palms on the bars, your fingers should rest on the top of the break levers . You should have a straight arm from the top of your shoulder to the tips of your fingers. You should then have the bars angled with an up and back sweep to open your chest so you can breath deeper ( this position opens up the chest cavity allowing your lungs to expand) .

it's a none to bad bike just needs upgrades, e.g different rear shock , brakes and forks . Be prepared to do a lot of wheel truing too. those alex rims ding very easily .
  • + 0 props
(Sep 10, 2008 at 13:39) (Below Threshold) show comment
me thinks the forks are a wee bit to long for that frame. looks like 130mm for a 100mm frame.
  • + 0 props
(Sep 7, 2008 at 13:31) (Below Threshold) show comment
you would be better off with Z1 QR20's rather than 55's head angle would be steeper for better control and wont put as much pressure on the welds round the head tube which could cause a failure to the frame . Just my pennies worth.
  • + 0 props
(Sep 4, 2008 at 0:11) (Below Threshold) show comment
he's a villa fan then Smile
  • + 0 props
(Sep 2, 2008 at 0:33) (Below Threshold) show comment
nice idea how well do they work?
  • + 0 props
(Sep 2, 2008 at 0:21) (Below Threshold) show comment
ooooohhhhh yeah ! Now that's what I'm talkin' 'bout. sweet dude .
Previous Page1Next Page